| ||
Institute for the History of Material Culture RAS,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia sinitsyn@as6238.spb.edu
|
In spite of the increasing number of new palaeolithic sites in Eastern Europe studied during the last 50 years, taxonomic position of nearly all of them are defined by theirs relation to two cultural-stratigraphic sequences: Molodovo and Kostenki. The Molodovo model constructed during 1950-60s in classical works by A.P. Chernysh and I.K. Ivanova and recently updated by P. Haesaerts (Belgium), represents a unilinear model of evolution covering a large time span from Middle Palaeolithic to Mesolithic. The Kostenki model has been under construction until now. It remains
incomplete due to the incessant influx of archaeological material, as
well as to the diversification of analytical studies, which facilitate
permanent reshuffling of interpretation concepts. In its classical form
the Kostenki model was first developed in 1950-60s by A.N. Rogachev in
cooperation with G.I. Lazukov and A.A. Velichko based on excavations of
multilayered sites. It was a tripartite sequence reflecting the triple
subdivision of the sedimentary succession. Sites of the late (III)
chronological group were related to the loess-like silts of the
colluvial mantle on the II and I river terraces. The middle (II) and
ancient (I) groups were associated with two humic beds separated by
volcanic ash. Their chronological brackets were established as 36-33 kyr
for the ancient, 32-27 kyr for the middle, and 26-20 kyr for the recent
group according to the series of radiocarbon dates provided in 1980s by
joint efforts of N.D. Praslov and L.D. Sulerzhitsky. According to this
model sites of the LGM were absent at Kostenki due to the lack of
sedimentary record for that time. Excavations of 1998-2006 at Kostenki 14 (Markina Gora) made the site a
key section both for geological and cultural successions of the region
with the complete series of 9 cultural layers relating to the late MIS 3
- early MIS 2, or in geochronometric terms - to 44(?)-22 kyr interval.
The section appears to be one of the best equipped by natural science
data: there are 2 pollen diagrams plus a series of more than 60
radiocarbon and 40 OSL-IRSL dates counted in different laboratories. Of
particular significance are the chronologic markers of high temporal
resolution. These are the palaeomagnetic excursion Lachamp-Kargopolovo
(c. 42 kyr) within a fossil soil and volcanic ash layer and the volcanic
ash itself. The ash in the central Russian Plain is connected in origin
with the Campanian Ignimbrite (CI) eruption at the Phlegraean Fields
Caldera in southern Italy and horizon Y5 in the Mediterranean bottom
sediments dated to 39-41 calendar kyr. This implies that the cultural
layers of Upper Palaeolithic affiliation from beneath these horizons are
even older. Actually, we face here the most ancient manifestation of
Upper Palaeolithic technocomplexes traditionally related to the earliest
appearance of anatomically modern humans in Eastern Europe. The new archaeological assemblages and large amount of new natural
science data put forward a number of new problems that are not normally
evident in the conditions of usual deficiency of artifacts and
analytical support.
The most important appears to be the problem of two chronological
time-scales: the «short» radiocarbon one, and the «long» scale based on
IRSL-OSL series, palaeomagnetic and palynological data and on the
volcanic marker. The modern data on the chronology of MIS 3 and early
stage of the Upper Palaeolithic taken into account, the deviation of the
radiocarbon ages from the calendar time scale is 6 to 12 kyr for the
time span of 44 to 30 kyr. A possible solution might be sought for in
the new series of OSL datings obtained in 2005 by the efforts of
rersearchers from University of Bergen, Norway, and luminescence
laboratory of Aarhus University, Denmark. This series is to be corrected
and assessed currently.
|
Reference:
Sinitsyn
A.A.
Geological
and cultural sequences of the Palaeolithic site Kostenki 14 (Markina Gora),
Middle Don: chronological aspects.
Correlation of Pleistocene Events in the Russian North. International
Workshop Abstracts.
4-6
December
2006.
Saint-Petersburg,
2006,
p.
92. |